The 2016 Sports
Illustrated Swimsuit Issue has recently been released and it seems more
degrading than ever. Yes, this magazine has always objectified women and has
sent the message that their soul value lies in their body and their beauty. But
it seems that this issue goes one step further. The women typically featured in
Sports Illustrated wear next to nothing, but this time some of the women only
wore paint. Meaning some had bathing suits painted on them. I have an issue
with this. These women are physically not wearing clothes; although they
maintain some ‘modesty’ there is nothing other than paint covering them. Is this
the kind of women we want portrayed on magazines? Are these the ideas we want to
send to young girls? Is this the only way women can be seen as pretty now a
day? I know that the magazine covers in the past show women wearing
barely-there swimsuits, but the fact that there are some not even wearing
bathing suits is a whole other issue. The whole concept behind this addition
seems ridiculous, sexist, and disgraceful. It basically suggests that being
naked is the only way to get attention and be beautiful. The theme is ‘the
perfect body painting’ continues to objectify women and place value on their
body. It portrays women in the media as a commodity and a body prop rather than
someone with talent and intelligence. What’s next?
No comments:
Post a Comment